Looking for some consultants for a possible PicoLisp prototype of a blockchain. It’ a collaboration between a Swiss cantons and one of the large US States. Think cowboys… lol.
At this point I’m checking bill rates and availability. Anyone on the GSA pre-clear list by chance? Cheers, Alex Ross PMO Lead us.new +1.213.500.5925 > On May 7, 2021, at 10:02, A. Laszlo Ross <m...@laszlo.xyz> wrote: > > Oh, wow, I didn’t know there was a PilOS. I’m a picolisp noob but that might > be perfect for an upcoming IoT type project. > > The web page said there’s no network stack so I’d have to add that. > > Is it written in C? Assembly? Something else? > > > >> On May 7, 2021, at 09:52, Daniel Perron <61du...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Thank you for the precisions and Picolisp, it is a very nice system. >> >> On Fri, May 7, 2021, 12:11 AM Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de >> <mailto:abu@software-labde>> wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> > In that case, what is the status of Picolisp 32-bit? >> > I read in the doc in many places "64-bit version only". Is Picolisp 32-bit >> > deprecated? >> >> All PicoLisp versions except pil21 (e.g. pil32, pil64, miniPicoLisp, >> ErsatzLisp, >> PilMCU and PilOS) are still around, but I don't actively maintain them any >> more. >> >> >> > If so, it creates a cognitive dissonance in my mind. A system >> > created to be small and fast runs only on 64-bit? >> >> I believe this is no contradiction. The system is still small and fast, just >> the >> pointer size is 64 instead of 32 bits. >> >> The trend is towards 64 bits, in servers, desktops, notebooks, smartphones >> and >> even single-board computers (RasPi). Only small embedded systems remain, and >> there just miniPicoLisp makes sense. >> >> BTW, the "pico" in the name never meant the system size (you can build large >> applications with PicoLisp), but the small number of basic concepts. >> >> ☺/ A!ex >> >> -- >> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de >> <mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de>?subject=Unsubscribe
