On Tue, Feb 23, 2021, 23:06 Davide BERTOLOTTO <davide.bertolo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> After all these years I am still wondering how people like complicated
> sintaxes full of special forms more than the simplicity of lisp. After all,
> the parentheses and the prefix notation do not look so terrible to me,
> especially considering that you gain a lot in clarity and simplicity of the
> language. Probably is the same reason that pushes people to create yet
> another programming language every now and then xD.
>

  Exactly!

  C(11) is not a write-only language, but at best a write-once language!!
A Turing Tarpit.

  `` Fools ignore complexity.  Pragmatists suffer it.  Some can avoid it.
Geniuses remove it.
   '' -- Alan Perlis, Epigrams on Programming

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021, 21:03 pd <eukel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 5:00 PM Danilo Kordic <danilo.kor...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>   'float' could be implemented as a lib.
>>>
>>
>> yes, but the point here it is not at core and even having a float lib or
>> whatever science lib, python is plenty of them and a nicer syntax
>>
>> it's not about me neither talking about (pico)lisp features and better
>> syntax, I'm yet convinced 'cause I'm a schemer thus a lisper and I'm here
>> in that list after all
>> But most people don't think so and no matter how better and nicer I find
>> the lisp syntax, the world thinks the opposite ;-)
>>
>> maybe you can find a killer app or even a killer science app leting
>> picolisp shine but as soon as people has to program in picolisp (I mean
>> scripting) they will feel uncofortable, they will always prefer R or
>> python, just for syntax, not talking about huge amount of libraries and
>> community support,  developers should enjoy (pico)lisp facilities to
>> develop and organice knowledge but as soon as had practical issue the lack
>> of specialized libraries will make them comply thinking in wide spread
>> python or ruby (just talking dynamic 'script' languages only)...
>>
>> It's not a problem of picolisp only, it's common to all lisp dialects and
>> even cool minor languages... This is the reason for using lua for scripting
>> rather than picolisp, guile or even tcl
>> Also this is the problem for all lisp about their use in real apps,  I
>> see this in common lisp, in scheme, ...  The only lisp-like with hype and
>> relative wide use is clojure and one key reason is libraries (achieved by
>> jvm side)
>>
>> And this is how it's gonna be... we live in the dictatorship of C-like
>> syntax world! ;-)
>>
>> (damnification is not only in lisp world,  same happen to smalltalk and
>> derivatives, forth-like derivatives and so on)
>>
>
  This is complete rubbish (IMHO)!!  You are not even a normie, but an
NPC!!

Reply via email to