Yes, please, find some way to record it. Even if fully unedited and unstructured. One can download video from youtube and do quick seeks to find stuff.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 9:14 AM C K Kashyap <ckkash...@gmail.com> wrote: > While at it, it would be good to touch on the "interpreter only" approach > of PicoLisp. It is objectively simpler than an interpreter AND compiler > implementation. However, I would love for some expansion on the explanation > of "True equivalence of code and data". Also, is there any update to the > view on performance in the context of new machines. > > Would it be possible to record these? > > Regards, > Kashyap > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:32 AM Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> > wrote: > >> Hi Alex, >> >> > For me the greatest obstacle in using picolisp is the lack of arrays. >> Let's >> > talk about what I'm doing wrong and why I don't need them! >> >> Yes, good idea. This is a valid and common question. >> >> Maybe, as a warm-up, you could also check "Array Abstinence" at >> >> https://picolisp.com/wiki/?arrayabstinence >> >> ☺/ A!ex >> >> -- >> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >> >
