Thanks Alex/Beneroth, Okay ... just to clarify. (collect 'nm '+Tag "BLUE" NIL T 'itm) is the recommended way to get to all items for a given Tag. I should perhaps use an indirection to +Tag class so that I do not repeat it every time.
After some thinking it seems that perhaps I could just go with a bit field and and inline number relation for this :) Regards, Kashyap On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 8:48 AM Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 05:11:15PM +0100, andr...@itship.ch wrote: > > +Idx is for +String, actually a special variant of the general > > non-unique index +Ref. > > Correct, makes sense only for strings, as it indexes substrings. > > > > Now I'm currently unsure if +Ref and +Joint can be combined... might be > > that +Joint cannot be indexed? > > At least it is meaningless, as I said in the other mail. > > A (+Ref +Link) lets you look up an object in the +Ref index and you find > all > objects that link to this one. > > A (+Joint) is the same, in that if you have an object, you directly have a > pointer to the jointed one, without need for index lookup. > > ☺/ A!ex > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >
