I do have a seperate pil64 install for the emulated version. It's just that it can be slow, startup(in debug mode) and numeric computation.
When doing certain things the performance gap between pil32 and emu pil64 can also be quite high $ pil64 : (Bench(t (who 'car] -> 13.575 secs $ pil : (bench (t (who 'car] -> 0.304 secs I didn't think of this before but now tried copying the picolisp binary and some of it's folders into the install directory. All tests pass so it's fine. Will reply to the original email should I find something next week or so. Thanks for answering. JmageK -- Securely sent with Tutanota Apr 20, 2019, 9:09 PM by a...@software-lab.de: > Hi JmageK, > >> Does anyone have a working makefile for pil32 arm? or can help me get this >> working. >> > > I don't have a Makefile, and in fact nothing for pil32, but if pil64 and/or > emu32 is OK for you, you can grab the scripts > > PilBox/mk.arm64.android > PilBox/mk.emu.arm32 > > from > https://software-lab.de/PilBox.tgz <https://software-lab.de/PilBoxtgz> > > The README in that the tarball (or at > https://software-lab.de/PilBox/README > <https://software-lab.de/PilBox/README>> ) > explains what you need to build from scratch in the chapter "Building the > PilBox > Kernel". > > > If you just want the latest binaries, you find the 64-bit versions > > PilBox/picoLisp/bin/picolisp > PilBox/picoLisp/lib/ext > PilBox/picoLisp/lib/ht > > in the tarball too. They run fine in Termux, they are what I use myself. > > The 32-bit emu versions are in > https://software-lab.de/emu32.zip > <https://software-lab.de/emu32.zip> > > ☺/ A!ex > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:> picolisp@software-lab.de > <mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de>> ?subject=Unsubscribe > -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
