Sorry for the large email and even while pretending to be a clarifying text
it is not :(

Also don't want to give an image of pretending to arrange picolisp's flaw
design, it is absolutely not, not only I don't have the needed
understanding of picolisp nor the knowledge to do so but I consider
picolisp a pretty good design with very smart decisions. What I trying to
do is speaking out loud spreading out my thoughts to see if my
understanding is right and also to see if my ideas may be useful somehow or
must be considered as nonsenses

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:17 AM, pd <eukel...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> But let me try to better explain myself...
>
>

Reply via email to