Hi all, by chance I stumbled yesterday over a bug in the '@@' result handling of the read-eval-loop. Very surprising, because the bug was there all the time, and I used this feature quite often.
: (and 3) -> 3 : (and 4) -> 4 : (cons @@ @) -> (4 . 4) The call '(and 4)' caused the previous value of '@' to be destroyed. Now it is fixed: : (and 3) -> 3 : (and 4) -> 4 : (cons @@ @) -> (3 . 4) Cheers, Alex -- Software Lab. Alexander Burger Bahnhofstr. 24a, D-86462 Langweid [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.software-lab.de, +49 8230 5060
