> Ahhh.... The age old question about storing > images in the database ;)
I take no stand point for either side, but from a puristic relational stand point, binary contents has nothing, what so ever, to in the RDBMS. This is, of course, only a thumb rule, then of course we can find good execptions from this. But I think one should not automatically put everything into the RDBMS, just because of the sake of things. > The obvious caveats are: a hit in performance > and a very large database. Unless the RDBMS has inplimented file pointers instead of actually storing a chunk of binary lumps in your RDBMS. -- PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
