To:  Scott Hurring
You probably could have just changed the security restriction on the
dll in question.. the problem was likely that winamp was running in a
separate desktop space from the user apache was running as.. so either
you would have to create a wrapper service, or pretty much do what you
did...

can't say for apache.. but in iis, you could have created a separate
application folder for the php that needed to access winamp, and without
any extra extensions beyond php, should not have issues...

Personally, I am one to REMOVE anything not being used.. in iis, I will
remove unused asp extensions for php projects, and vice-versa.. this
helps limit exposure...

Code Red was averted on all the servers I had setup, because the
extensions and folders that were suspect weren't in there the way I
had things setup.  Don't get me wrong, I like apache okay, just know
IIS better, and have worked with it longer... the php projects I have
been working on lately are deployed on apache/linux, but they are run
by another admin...

--
=======================================================================
Michael J. Ryan  -  tracker1[*at*]theroughnecks.com
Roughneck BBS: http://www.theroughnecks.net  telnet://theroughnecks.net
=======================================================================
Y!: aztracker1 - aim: azTracker1 - icq: 4935386 - msn: see email
One program for aim/icq/yahoo/msn/irc  -  http://www.trillian.cc/


" Scott Hurring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You're entirely correct -- IF it was an internet
> accessable webserver.
>
> It's installed locally on my workstation solely for
> local development.  It's got a pretty nice corporate
> firewall and "httpd.conf" restrictions setup to deny
> access to everyone 'cept me.  Of course, firewalls
> and corporate LAN's can be hacked, but i figure that
> if someone's good/determined enough to hack into this
> particular LAN, apache security flaws are the least
> of my worries.  :-)
>
> But basically, i did that beucase i'm not too fluent
> with the bizarre system of Win2k permissions and
> system accounts...
>
> ---
> Scott Hurring
> Systems Programmer
> EAC Corporation
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Voice: 201-462-2149
> Fax: 201-288-1515
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neil Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:56 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: run as
> >
> >
> > At 09:15 09/07/2002 +0000, you wrote:
> > >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >From: "Scott Hurring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:36:52 -0400
> > >Subject: Re: WinampCOM problem
> > >
> > >What user is your Server running as?
> >
> > Whoa ! This is a really, really *bad* idea - you have given
> > the web server
> > access to all the files which are owned by you as far as I
> > can tell, and
> > have introduced a major security hole. A web server should
> > *always* run as
> > its own (low-privilege) user, and be given limited access to
> > specific files
> > by adjusting the permissions on the file & directory on a
> > case by case
> > basis, not the other way around.
> >
> > Please tell me the address of your webserver, I wanna hack it ;-)
> > (Actually you dont need to - somebody will probably beat me to it!)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Neil Smith.
> >
> > >For me, when i setup apache on my Win2k machine, i
> > >had to "RunAs" my personal "scott" account, rather than
> > >the system account, or else apache wouldn't be able to
> > >read certain "scott-only" files.... perhaps the user that
> > >apache is running as doesn't have permission to do
> > >COM stuff.... but i really don't know for sure.
> > >
> > >--
> > >Scott Hurring
> > >Systems Programmer
> > >EAC Corporation
> > >scott (*) eac.com
> > >--
> > >"Olivier Hubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >
> --- Synchronet NewsLink v1.00 Beta
>
--- Synchronet NewsLink v1.00 Beta
 *  Roughneck BBS - www.theroughnecks.net - telnet://theroughnecks.net

-- 
PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to