Why don't you test the different versions and let us know which is more stable. On Windows stability is a very subjective thing.
-Rasmus On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Alan McKay wrote: > Folks, > > This is kind of frustrating. > > I'm reading the install.txt and near the top it explains about the 2 versions, > those being PHP.EXE and the SAPI modules. It then says that the SAPI > version is not considered production grade, and is still unstable > "especially on platforms older than W2K". > > Then later on in the same document it says : > > "Now that version 4.1 introduces a safer sapi module, we recommend > that you configure PHP as a module in Apache." > > OK, so which is it? I am to be using this in a commercial product, and > absolutely have to have the most stabile version. I'd prefer to run the > SAPIs because they are apparantly faster, but the document contradicts > itself on which is most stabile. > > Can someone help clarify this? (And if someone responsible for that > document is listening, could you please update it accordingly?) > > thanks, > -Alan > > > > -- > PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
