Jim, I'm trying to figure out what in the world you are doing differently than me that you are getting any failures without the %s %s ? I have been running php for 9 months now, and having at one point 10 extensions turned on including added ones not from the php.net package, and I have never got failures of execution (not that I witnessed anyway) And I've run this on 4 different windows servers now. I'm not saying I don't believe you, I'm sure you are getting the errors you claim, I'm just boggled as to how your system is sensitive enough to get them!? What exactly are you running? Angie Tollerson Alliance Technologies Web Programmer (515)245-7628 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> "Powell, Jim (EER)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/16/01 05:48PM >>> I hate it when the messages don't reply to the lists! > -----Original Message----- > From: Powell, Jim (EER) > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:45 PM > To: 'Angie Tollerson' > Subject: RE: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Installation failed ! > Please Help! > > > OK, pretty straight forward, I went through my list of > failures, and Almost all of them (the ones that failed > without the %s %s) used extensions to PHP (ming, crypt, etc, > etc). They simply would return a CGI error bad header > returned (or something along those lines, I forget what IIS > put in there). Other things like mySQL and the other built > in functions seemed to work fine without them (them = %s %s), > so I guess it would depend on what you use PHP for as to > whether the %s %s is needed. > > Of course Mr. Santiago has the official reason (at least from > Microsoft's perspective) in another e-mail. > > Jim Powell > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Angie Tollerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:25 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [PHP-WIN] Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WIN] Installation > > failed ! Please > > Help! > > > > > > Jim, > > Could you give us an example and explanation as to why no %s > > %s is unstable? How has this failed you ? because I've never > > had a problem with not having it in there that I know of. > > PHP has always executed for me properly, NT 4.0 and w2k. But > > if it is unstable I don't want to find out later. Thanks! > > > > > > Angie Tollerson > > Alliance Technologies > > Web Programmer > > (515)245-7628 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >>> Phil Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/16/01 12:20PM >>> > > On Thursday 16 August 2001 4:45 pm, Powell, Jim (EER) wrote: > > > > > > Second, make the application extensions point to php.exe (you > > > > don't need the > > > > %s %s stuff). > > > > > > This I have to disagree with. Without the %s %s, you are > > rolling dice as > > > to whether the page will work or not. I never had this > > problem with Apache > > > under win32, but I have with IIS. I would definitely leave > > them in there. > > > > I'll have to strongly disagree with your disagreement ;) > > > > -- > > Phil Driscoll > > > > -- > > PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
