>I don't agree with the general rule of thumb that the use of the >"Location" header is bad, but I have reviewed plenty of code where >people misuse it terribly, as a lazy goto-style operation. In most >cases, you do want to design your application to: >1) receive data >2) analyze data >3) respond with appropriate response > >If you instead do this: >1) receive data >2) analyze data >3) respond with a "Location" header telling the Web client where to get >the appropriate response >4) receive the subsequent GET request >5) respond with appropriate response > >then this is the type of misuse that runs rampant and makes people like >Mr. Lynch have a distaste for its use.
Pretty much. I've wasted too much time trying to chase down the "paper trail" of re-direct after re-direct from badly-designed applications. Unfortunately, some very popular software packages (which shall remain nameless) are rampant with this second "style" of coding. >Like many things, it is all a matter of the developer. Personally, I >like PHP's general approach of giving the developer the power to do >anything, even if it is bad. *shrug* Most criticism I've heard of PHP >(like the bogus security vulnerabilities cited in PHP) stems from this >characteristic. Hey, I like the flexibility. I just wish more PHP scripters were better programmers so there was a better quality of code out there, so PHP wouldn't be getting slagged for "security vulnerabilities" that are the fault of the programmer, not PHP. If you do a lot of Location: headers, re-think your design. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
