Hi Manuel, I still don't see a problem in others telling their experiences with certain packages. If someone has just used metabase or has just used adodb then I would like to hear how easy/hard it was to port to another database.
-----Original Message----- From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: April 18, 2002 9:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sp Subject: Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PHP] Re: Cross DB application Hello, Sp wrote: > > Can someone with database expertise who has used metabase and adodb cut > through this rhetoric and give an objective view of these two packages. > From what I got from this convo is that metabase is slower but more portable > but adodb is faster but not as portable. No, Metabase does much more than ADODB. When you do more, eventually things may take a little longer when you do less. This should be obvious. Anyway, if you really care about portability, you're only way out is Metabase. Other abstraction packages were not meant for portability but rather for interface makeup. I think you will be the better judge of that if you try looking at least at each package documentation. It is pointless to ask to people here when most of them only know one or the other package. Regards, Manuel Lemos -- PHP Database Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
