B. van Ouwerkerk wrote: > Ask yourself.. who has an attitude problem here.. Someone who didn't > read the manual.. or someone (/me) who wrote to RTFM. You didn't even RTFM him. I found it to be more like RTM, the more gentle version (the one without words connected to sexual intercourse). Your answer was short, but not harsh. I thought so, anyway. regards Wagner PS: Enough said. -- Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: [PHP] Attitude of B van Ouwerkerk Johnson, Kirk
- Re: [PHP] Attitude of B van Ouwerkerk Kyle Smith
- Re: [PHP] Attitude of B van Ouwerkerk Ezra Nugroho
- Re: [PHP] Attitude of B van Ouwerkerk B. van Ouwerkerk
- Re: [PHP] Attitude of B van Ouwerkerk Kyle Smith
- RE: [PHP] Attitude of B van Ouwerkerk Alexander Wagner
- RE: [PHP] Attitude of B van Ouwerkerk scott [gts]
- Re: [PHP] Attitude of B van Ouwe... Alexander Wagner
- Re: [PHP] Attitude of B van ... Miles Thompson
- RE: [PHP] Attitude of B van Ouwerkerk Matthew Loff
- [PHP] New lists (was [PHP] Attitude of B... Darren Henderson
- [PHP] Re: New lists (was [PHP] Attit... Richard Lynch
- Re: [PHP] New lists (was [PHP] Attit... Miles Thompson
- Re: [PHP] New lists (was [PHP] ... Richard Lynch
- Re: [PHP] New lists (was [PHP] ... Joel Ricker
- Re: [PHP] New lists (was [P... Andreas D. Landmark