... no Apache uses processes, but can also use threads. nginx and lighttpd both use a threaded model. But you seem to have this idea in your head that it's PHP's fault and switching to a threaded webserver / CGI model will solve any noticeable scalability problems, so feel free to ditch PHP for ASP because you think it'll be anywhat faster. I'll save you some time: it won't.
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:44 PM, tRace DOliveira <married...@yahoo.com>wrote: > > What I am trying to get at is that PHP uses processes(Heavy weight) and > ASP.NET uses threads which are light weight. So it inflicts less strain > upon the web server. So I am trying to solve the problem of the strain that > PHP causes on ther server. > --- On *Wed, 5/27/09, Eddie Drapkin <oorza...@gmail.com>* wrote: > > > From: Eddie Drapkin <oorza...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP scalability problem > To: "tRace DOliveira" <married...@yahoo.com> > Cc: "PHP General Mailing List" <php-general@lists.php.net> > Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 3:39 AM > > > > I seriously doubt it. PHP is a better language in almost all regards and > is much much more popular. A lot of people make that decision every day and > I'd say most of them choose PHP. Why ask that, though? > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:36 PM, tRace DOliveira > <married...@yahoo.com<http://us.mc1104.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=married...@yahoo.com> > > wrote: > >> >> Do you agree with me that when building a large web application that >> people would rather choose ASP.Net over PHP if people had to choose between >> those two ? >> --- On *Wed, 5/27/09, Eddie Drapkin >> <oorza...@gmail.com<http://us.mc1104.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=oorza...@gmail.com> >> >* wrote: >> >> >> From: Eddie Drapkin >> <oorza...@gmail.com<http://us.mc1104.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=oorza...@gmail.com> >> > >> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP scalability problem >> To: "Michael Shadle" >> <mike...@gmail.com<http://us.mc1104.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mike...@gmail.com> >> > >> Cc: "tRace DOliveira" >> <married...@yahoo.com<http://us.mc1104.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=married...@yahoo.com>>, >> "intern...@lists.php.net<http://us.mc1104.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=intern...@lists.php.net>" >> <intern...@lists.php.net<http://us.mc1104.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=intern...@lists.php.net> >> > >> Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 3:29 AM >> >> >> nginx and php-fpm is the fastest setup I could find, after spending almost >> 2 weeks trying different combinations. >> >> Apache pre-fork model: 1900 reqs/second (this is with running queries per >> pageload) >> nginx w/ fpm: 3400 reqs/second >> >> And nginx's doc setup is awesome. >> >> Like Michael said, scaling PHP itself is no big deal, just add more worker >> nodes to your process pool, the issue is scaling out your sql server >> (memcache scaling is piss easy too) >> >> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Michael Shadle >> <mike...@gmail.com<http://us.mc1104.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mike...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >>> Succinct and great reply. >>> >>> Better webserver: nginx :) >>> >>> #3 is probably the most important piece. >>> >>> I'd like to also note scaling php is pretty simple. Scaling out typically >>> provides better results as opposed to scaling up. Scaling your datastore >>> will always be your pain point. Adding new data nodes is complex. Adding >>> more php processing nodes is simple. Php nodes are just worker bees. They're >>> great for shared-nothing processing engines. >>> >>> I can't think of a good metaphor right now other than that. >>> >>> On May 26, 2009, at 7:55 PM, Eddie Drapkin >>> <oorza...@gmail.com<http://us.mc1104.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=oorza...@gmail.com>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> 1) PHP is Rarely The Bottleneck: >>>> http://talks.php.net/show/drupal08/< >>>> http://talks.php.net/show/drupal08/7> >>>> >>>> 2) Invest in an opcode cache >>>> 3) DB I/O is always the most restrictive part of your application, read >>>> the >>>> mysql performance blog (a lot applies for postgres too) >>>> 4) If you're serious about scalability, ditch apache and use a better >>>> webserver >>>> 5) You're describing what ajax does in a lot of cases >>>> 6) Have you deployed flatfile cache / apc / memcached? If so, how? >>>> 7) Do you regularly run siege tests on new server stacks and profile >>>> each >>>> piece's impact on performance? >>>> 8) Do you profile your code every time you change some piece of logic? >>>> >>>> Scalability is an enormous mountain to climb and there's only so much >>>> you >>>> can offload on to the client. Chances are there's more room for >>>> improvement >>>> at any stage in your development than there is potentiality for >>>> client-side >>>> processing. >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:46 PM, tRace DOliveira >>>> <married...@yahoo.com<http://us.mc1104.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=married...@yahoo.com> >>>> >wrote: >>>> >>>> PHP is a server side scripting language, so that means that the server >>>>> will >>>>> have to do the bulk of the processing if not most. >>>>> I was thinking about shifting the processing to the client. Kinda like >>>>> how >>>>> java does it. I don't know really know how java does it but it would be >>>>> interesting if it could be done for PHP also. >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> Leonard D'Oliveira >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > >
