On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Daniel Baldoni wrote:
> Considering NFS is stateless, why do you consider it to be a more acceptable
> solution to, say, rsync (which I personally don't like - but that's another
> matter)?
Ok, sorry, I should have explained my reasoning.
Afaik rsync executes periodically to synchronize files between two
stations (correct me if I am wrong), but changes are not mirrored
instantly. Please correct me if I am wrong.
With NFS, changes are instant because they are stored on a central NFS
server, just as it happens with db storage solutions.
That's why I said that rsync does not seem a viable solution.
georgeb
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
