On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Nathan Nobbe <quickshif...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> plus did you see the part about 'cleaning up the include path'.  moving to
> require at the outer layer and as far in as possible, basically.  thats a
> really good idea, and it looks like this 'includes' extension
>

lol, its 'inclued' dummy :P

-other dude

Reply via email to