On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Nathan Nobbe <quickshif...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > plus did you see the part about 'cleaning up the include path'. moving to > require at the outer layer and as far in as possible, basically. thats a > really good idea, and it looks like this 'includes' extension > lol, its 'inclued' dummy :P -other dude