On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:05 PM, M. Sokolewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Colin Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Pavel wrote:
>>>
>>>  В сообщении от Thursday 12 June 2008 16:43:59 Richard Heyes написал(а):
>>>>
>>>>  This may be of interest (HTML 5 diffences to HTML 4 overview):
>>>>>
>>>>>  what about xHTML? html died few years ago and i thought is was
>>>> official..
>>>>
>>>>  Oh there are *lots* of discussions about that. Personally I'm sticking
>>> with
>>> XHTML.
>>>
>>
>>
>> i imagine at some point we will see a revision of xhtml that incorporates
>> the changes from html4 -> 5.  something like xhtml 1.1 or 2.0.  at version
>> 1.0, its still just a pup }:D
>>
>> -nathan
>>
>
> uuuhhmmm.... 1.0? The thing is already at 1.1 and 2.0 is in the make...
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2 is the latest (xhtml 2.0) draft.
> XHTML™ 2.0 W3C Working Draft 26 July 2006, not that new anymore after 2
> years, most browsers even have good support for it these days.


i suppose i put too much faith in the right hand nav on the w3cschools site
=/

http://www.w3schools.com/

-nathan

Reply via email to