The following code is not mine, so I take no credit for it. It seems to
work fine for me, though:
<?
class c_Timer {
var $t_start = 0;
var $t_stop = 0;
var $t_elapsed = 0;
function start() { $this->t_start = microtime(); }
function stop() { $this->t_stop = microtime(); }
function elapsed() {
if ($this->t_elapsed) {
return $this->t_elapsed;
} else {
$start_u = substr($this->t_start,0,10);
$start_s = substr($this->t_start,11,10);
$stop_u = substr($this->t_stop,0,10);
$stop_s = substr($this->t_stop,11,10);
$start_total = doubleval($start_u) + $start_s;
$stop_total = doubleval($stop_u) +
$stop_s$
$this->t_elapsed = $stop_total - $start_total;
return $this->t_elapsed;
}
}
};
/* Here's an example usage:
$timer = new c_Timer;
$timer->start();
echo "<hr>";
$timer->stop();
echo $timer->elapsed();
*/
?>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rasmus Lerdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Merio, Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] RE: Processing time in PHP. better to use php tags inline
or pri nt("<html>");
> Why don't you just benchmark both?
>
> On Wed, 16 May 2001, Merio, Quinn wrote:
> > Sorry to nag, i hadnt recieved any responses on this post yet.. would
like
> > to re-request.. I wanted to know if there is drawbacks or benefits to
using
> > the php alternate syntax?
> >
> > > 1.) Is it possible (and if so, how do i) get the time it took to
process
> > > the page (seconds or milliseconds)?
> > >
> > > 2.) This is where the first q arose from: I am trying to ascertain
which
> > > is faster, outputting a query using the print function or using the
> > > alternate syntax. I know that in ASP, jumping in and out of the asp
code
> > > slows down the page processing.
> > >
> > > Here is the two ways i am outputting my recordset:
> > >
> > > 1.----- from within the php code -----
> > >
> > > <table cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4" border="2">
> > > <?php
> > >
> > > for ($i = 1; $i <= $nr; $i++){
> > > $row = mysql_fetch_assoc ($rs);
> > >
> > > print("<tr>");
> > > print("<td>");
> > > print($row['projectId']);
> > > print("</td><td>");
> > > print('<a
> > >
href="mylink.php?linkId='.$row['projectId'].'">'.$row['projectName'].'</a>
> > > ');
> > > print("</td><td>");
> > > print($row['projectStatus']);
> > > print("</tr>");
> > >
> > > } // End Loop rows
> > >
> > > ?>
> > >
> > > </table>
> > >
> > >
> > > 2.------------ inline code with the html --------------
> > >
> > > <table cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4" border="2">
> > > <? for ($i = 1; $i <= $nr; $i++): ?>
> > > <? $row = mysql_fetch_assoc ($rs);?>
> > > <tr>
> > > <td><?print($row['projectId']);?></td>
> > > <td><a
> > >
href="myfile?blah=<?=$row['projectId']?>"><?print($row['projectName']);?><
> > > /a></td>
> > > <td><?print($row['projectStatus']);?></td>
> > > </tr>
> > > <? endfor; ?>
> > > </table>
> > >
> > > Any thoughts from the experts? I love being able to mix html and php
tags,
> > > but am worried about efficiency.
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > >
> > > Quinn Merio
> > > Vir2lAlliance Inc.
> > > www.vir2lalliance.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
