""Richard Lynch"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, December 2, 2006 5:31 am, Tony Marston wrote:
>> If you site administrator thinks that using an htaccess file is a
>> security
>> issue then he is very much mistaken.  The directives in an htaccess
>> file DO
>> NOT enable you to access any one else's data on a shared server. All
>> they do
>> is apply additional settings to your own site while leaving UNTOUCHED
>> the
>> settings being used by other sites.
>>
>> Most professional web hosting companies do not have an issue with
>> htaccess
>> files, so if yours does I would suggest switching to one with a more
>> professional attuitude.
>
> I think it is quite possible for a sysAdmin to configure AllowOverride
> and .htaccess in such a way that "too much" latitude is granted to
> their clients to access each others' data...

I disagree. What directives can give you access to other people's data?

> And there is alleged to be a significant performance loss to
> .htaccess, so a hurried sysAdmin may have over-simplified their
> decision process...

"Alleged" is the word. Where are the figures to support this? While there is 
"some" performance loss, with the speed of today;'s PCs can this really be 
considered as "significant"?

> At any rate, if you need .htaccess, and they don't want to provide it,
> there are a few thousand webhosts that do.

Exactly. So it canno be that much of a problem.

> I certainly wouldn't sign up with a host that didn't provide it, and
> would move to one that did ASAP if I found myself using one that
> didn't provide that.

I agree absolutely.

-- 
Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org 

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to