Mathijs wrote: ...
>>> >>> Now i have a problem with the ETag. >> >> what are you using this header for? > > I Use this header to check if the content of a file has changed. > This because the content can be variable. But is static most of the time. > > I Compute an MD5 of the content, and add this to the ETag. > Normally a browser sends an HTTP_IF_NONE_MATCH back if it has an ETag. > If this gets send back, i compare them and if they are the same, they > get en 304 Not Modified back. > > Now Internet Explorer doesn't send this back when the content has been > compressed (gz_handler). > This because the Vary header has been set or something. > This is a bug in IE, and probably fixed in IE7. > freaking lightbulb moment for me!!! see how it pays to help people - you never know when you might get slapped in the face with some new knowledge :-) thanks! that said I wonder whether generating the dynamic content, buffering it, using the buffer to generate a md5 hash and then checking that is any faster than just outputting the generating content regardless? or is this purely a tactic to reduce bandwidth? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
