Yes yes I'm a zealot. :)
If the people defining the PEAR standards really were that interested in
standards,
why include alternate ways of doing something? <?=$blah;?>
And if the 'short tag' method is useful enough for people, why 'exclude' it
from a standard? This notion of 'PEAR standards' does irk me some, because
it's been so long in coming, and people are deferring to it before it's a reality.
At least, that's the impression that I get.
Philip Olson wrote:
>
> 1. Is PHP4+ specific
> 2. Won't work if short_open_tag setting is off (in php.ini)
> - One reason to turn this off, to enable XML support
> 3. Doesn't follow up-and-coming PEAR coding standards
>
> And as you've seen, many don't even know what <?= is. You'll find zealots
> on both sides of this use, the choice is yours. ;-)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
