>
> Thanks, that was my next question...I was told to look at PEAR from
> the beginning. All I can say is PEAR looks very exciting for me.
>
> Some good coding structure ideas that have been brought into the
> Lasso developer circles over the years:
>
> 1) FrameWork...(incredible piece of work) I have friend that is
> working on porting it to PHP.
> http://www.fwpro.com/
>
> 2) Corral (basically a cascading includes system)
> Appear to be offline at the moment: http://www.corralmethodology.com/
>
> 3) One-File (basically similar to FuseBox, but without the "black
> box") Stems from corral. I know I have seen a lot of PHP developers
> develop with this style, such as ?page=1, etc...
> --

I tend to follow the pear standards in many ways but i dont build classes
for pear maybe i should ? I pretty much follow all the naming conventions,
code commenting and structuring standards. For webpage apps i use a file
for each section with a main include which includes all my classes,
functions and constants and database connections. For content management
systems i use a system similar to fusebox, i use a switch case method with
an action ie action=edit, action=update, action=insert, but each section
has its own file. And i put my code within these parts, i also use a
templating system called phemplate because it seemed to be the most
efficient, simple and non bloatware system out there.

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to