* Thus wrote Raquel Rice ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 21:07:50 +0000
> Curt Zirzow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > * Thus wrote Raquel Rice ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:37:38 -0400
> > > > > 
> > > > its because of the new PHP virus (PHP.virdrus) and opussoft's
> > > > anti virus 
> > > >    program decided not to accept any mails that contains the
> > > >    word php. 
> > > > aparently some one from that company subscribed to php lists
> > > > but is not aware of their mail server settings now. I tried to
> > > > mail the tech contact for opussoft.com (
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] as listed in whois) but seems his
> > > > a/c is over quota.
> > > > 
> > > > so unless the person from opussoft is unsubscribed from the
> > > > list, we r going to get this mail each time we post to the
> > > > list.
> > > > 
> > > > R'twick
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I just fixed my mail server to bounce their post back to them
> > > with a 550 error message telling them to fix their problem.
> > 
> > I'm not so sure that is the proper way to solve the issue.
> 
> That's a rather cryptic response.  Why is it not proper and what is
> your "more proper" solution?  

Yeah I suppose it was :)  There are a couple of reasons.

What they are doing is bad, no email server should autorespond like
that. autoresponders are bad

Now, if they decide to autorespond to your autorespond, you're
going to flood both your network and their network and infinatly
send a message back and forth.

If you don't want to see those messages I would suggest, then, to
have your server send the message to /dev/null.

Ok.. I take that back now.. a 550 should get terminated by the
sender. 

Forget all the above.. cept the first sentence.

Curt
-- 
"I used to think I was indecisive, but now I'm not so sure."

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to