Brian White wrote:
>
> At 10:50 AM 1/19/12 +0200, Teodor Cimpoesu wrote:
>
> >I was refering to whole story of using `<?' in xml docs.
>
> Part of the problems is that multiple different applications
> can use PI's, so they need to be able to tell which ones are
> their's - therefore the first thing that should go in a PI
> is some kind of indication as to which application requires
> it.
>
> Therefore: Always "<?php" is a much better idea than "<?"
>
my follow-up was from an suggest of using <% though :)
it exists in C, ASP and JSP. We have it in PHP, why not use it?
besides moving a site arround into a configuration you cannot control
I see no other reason.
-- teodor
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
