Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (20th
October). We are delighted to welcome Professor Amie Thomasson (Dartmouth),
who will be giving a talk entitled 'Should Ontology be Explanatory?'. The
abstract for the talk is as follows:

*Since Quine, it has been common to hold that the goal of ontology is to
determine what entities we should or must ‘posit’ as part of a best total
explanatory theory. Accordingly, whether putative entities such as
meanings, properties, or numbers contribute explanatory power is often
taken as a central criterion for whether we should accept that they exist.*

*I will argue that this is a mistake. The explanatory power criterion
arises from failing to understand the diverse functions that different
areas of discourse can serve. A deeper understanding of the way these forms
of discourse enter language, and of the functional roles they play, makes
clear why we should reject the explanatory power criterion, and reject the
explanatory conception of ontology. I will close with some remarks about
how we should rethink our approach to existence questions—and, more deeply,
how we should re-focus our philosophical efforts.*


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom:
https://zoom.us/j/98343588455 (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter

--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  <msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_____________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.

Reply via email to