Dear all,

A reminder that Wes Wrigley will be talking today at SMG on "Sider's 
Ontologese Introduction Instructions" (abstract below).

As usual, we'll meet from 1-2.30pm in the Philosophy Faculty Board Room. 
Feel free to bring your lunch.

All welcome! I hope to see many of you there.

Dan.

Abstract:

In response to Hirsch’s deflationary arguments, Sider attempts to  
introduce a special ‘Ontologese’ quantifier to preserve the 
substantivity of  fundamental debates in metaphysics. He provides a list 
of instructions for  metaphysicians, which he argues suffice to give the 
new quantifier a meaning that carves nature at the joints. I argue that 
these instructions will not allow someone to start speaking Ontologese 
if their prior language is sufficiently  deviant with respect to it, and 
that natural languages may be in such a  position. I explore three 
options for Sider to circumvent this problem, and argue that none are 
successful.






On 2017-02-05 17:42, D. Williams wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> This Thursday our own Wes Wrigley will be at Serious Metaphysics
> talking on "Sider’s Ontologese Introduction Instructions" (abstract
> below).
> 
> As usual, we'll meet from 1-2.30pm in the Philosophy Faculty Board
> Room, with roughly 45 minutes of presentation and then 45 minutes of
> discussion. Feel free to bring along your lunch.
> 
> All welcome! I hope to see many of you there.
> 
> Dan.
> 
> Abstract:
> 
> In response to Hirsch’s deflationary arguments, Sider attempts to 
> introduce
> a special ‘Ontologese’ quantifier to preserve the substantivity of 
> fundamental
> debates in metaphysics. He provides a list of instructions for 
> metaphysicians,
> which he argues suffice to give the new quantifier a meaning that 
> carves
> nature at the joints. I argue that these instructions will not allow 
> someone
> to start speaking Ontologese if their prior language is sufficiently 
> deviant
> with respect to it, and that natural languages may be in such a 
> position. I
> explore three options for Sider to circumvent this problem, and argue 
> that
> none are successful.

-- 
Daniel Williams
PhD Candidate in Philosophy
Email: [email protected]
Trinity Hall, Cambridge

_____________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.

Reply via email to