Tuesday 15th March
Hugh Mellor, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Cambridge: 'Role Playing on 
Stage'
Venue: Seminar Room, 1 Newnham Terrace, Darwin College. (Enter by main door).
Time: 5.00pm to 7.00pm
Admission is free, and all are welcome.


Role-playing on stage, e.g. an actor playing Shakespeare's Richard III, clearly 
differs from role-playing in real life, e.g. Richard III playing that role in 
15th century London. On-stage role-playing has been distinguished from 
real-life role-playing in various ways: as involving 'make-believe', with 
audiences having to 'suspend their disbelief' (e.g. that they are watching 
Richard III); or 'pretence' (the actor pretends to be Richard III); or 
'imitation' (the actor imitates Richard III). I argue that none of these will 
do, and that on-stage role-playing is just a special kind of representation. 
That is, actors represent the characters they play, not by describing them, as 
the text of a novel, history book, or screenplay does, but by depicting them, 
as portraits or CGI animations of them do. But in stage (or screen) 
role-playing, unlike these other methods of depiction, real or fictional people 
(the characters) are being depicted by other people (the actors). This requires 
actors to
  use some of their own attributes (voice, appearance, etc.), adapted as 
required (by costume, makeup, etc.), to depict those of their characters. I 
show how this explains why actors often say they try to become the characters 
they play, why great performances are so hard to achieve, and why great parts 
(Richard III, Cleopatra, Othello) can be played equally well but very 
differently by different actors.

_____________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.

Reply via email to