Registration is now open for the conference 'Why We Disagree about Human 
Nature', to be held at CRASSH, University of Cambridge, 10–11 December 2015. 
Please visit www.crassh.cam.ac.uk/events/26169 
<http://www.crassh.cam.ac.uk/events/26169> for more information and to register.
 
Is human nature something that the natural and social sciences aim to describe, 
or is it a pernicious fiction? What role, if any, does ‘human nature’ play in 
directing and informing scientific work? Can we talk about human nature without 
invoking—either implicitly or explicitly—a contrast with human culture? It 
might be tempting to think that the respectability of ‘human nature’ is an 
issue that divides natural and social scientists along disciplinary boundaries, 
but the truth is more complex. Some evolutionary theorists have 
enthusiastically embraced ‘human nature’, while others have rejected it. Many 
social scientists have explicitly rejected it, while implicitly gesturing 
towards universal ‘cognitive schemas’. Philosophers, meanwhile, have recently 
put forward a variety of suggestions for how, if at all, we might make sense of 
this divisive notion.
 
With speakers from psychology, the philosophy of science, the philosophy of 
medicine, social and biological anthropology, evolutionary theory, and the 
study of animal cognition, this conference will explore these different 
approaches to the concept of 'human nature' and attempt to uncover and 
understand the sources of disagreement.
 
Programme details:
Gillian Brown (St Andrews) and Kevin Laland (St Andrews): The social 
construction of human nature
Heidi Colleran (Toulouse) and Fiona Jordan (Bristol): Bridging divides in 
anthropology using evolutionary theory
Stephen Downes (Utah): Understanding the evolutionary challenges to human nature
John Dupré (Exeter): The nature of human processes
Cecilia Heyes (Oxford): The development of human nature
Maria Kronfeldner (Central European University): Divide and conquer: The 
authority of nature and why we disagree about human nature
Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh): A plea for human nature, redux
Peter J Richerson (UC Davis): What work (or mischief) does 'human nature' do in 
the work of scientists?
Christina Toren (St Andrews): Human ontogenies as historical processes: Lessons 
from ethnography
 
Convenors: Beth Hannon, Tim Lewens, Sam Murison
 
Please direct all queries to Sam Murison ([email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>).




_____________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.

Reply via email to