Dear all,

This Thursday at the Serious Metaphysics Group, Toby Friend (from UCL) 
will be giving a talk titled 'Can parts cause their wholes?' (abstract 
below). We will meet in the philosophy faculty board room from 
1:00-2:30.

Hope to see you there,

Georgie


Are there any causes which are also parts of their effects? Two popular 
Humean principles entail that there are not: first, causes must precede 
their effects whereas parts cannot precede their wholes; second, causes 
must be ontologically independent of their effects whereas parts are not 
similarly independent of their wholes. As long  as we stick to 
pre-theoretical discussion of part-whole relationships  between events, 
I will argue that neither principle is well supported.  I first draw on 
a case-study: the collapse on August 2007 of  Minnesota’s Bridge 9340 
which carried the Interstate-35W over the  Mississippi. From a position 
of neutrality with regard to theories of  causation and parthood, I 
suggest that the post-analysis of the collapse revealed good reasons to 
conclude that the failure of the gusset plates at node U10 of the bridge 
was both a part and a cause of the collapse. This conclusion conflicts 
with both Humean principles. I then argue that neither principle is 
well-motivated on the basis of the coherence of the concepts involved or 
by more complex arguments put forward for them; in fact, there are 
reasons to reject them, further to the conclusion of the case-study 
itself. I end with some lessons for future theorising about causation 
and for the Humean tradition in philosophy of causation.

-- 
Georgie Statham
PhD Candidate
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge


_____________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.

Reply via email to