Dear all,

This is a reminder that tomorrow Ian Proops (UT Austin) will give a talk
entitled "Might I be Many? Kant on the Second Paralogism". An abstract is
provided below.

The meeting will be held at 5:15 on Tuesday, 13 May, in the *Boys Smith
Room *(found in the Fisher Building), St. John's College.

For more information, including details about our fees, and the final two
meetings of this academic year, please visit our website at
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc.

Finally, a reminder that on 20 May--the final meeting of the year--we will
hold our AGM during which we will discuss a possible change to MSC meeting
times. For those who will not be able to attend that meeting, please feel
free to email us with any questions or concerns you may have on this
matter.


Best,
Kyle Mitchell and Shyane Siriwardena


*Abstract*
In the ‘Second Paralogism” of the *Critique of Pure Reason *Kant critically
scrutinizes the claims of rational psychology to be able to demonstrate
that the soul, or ‘thinking I,’ is simple. Kant maintains that no such
knowledge can be attained by human beings, but he also claims that the
attempt to arrive at such knowledge is the result of ‘transcendental
illusion’: an abiding and universal intellectual illusion that tempts
finite beings to see the Principle of Sufficient Reason as unrestrictedly
valid. I discuss how transcendental illusion is supposed to tempt us to
commit the fallacy that constitutes the second paralogism, and I endeavour
also to explain in what exactly that fallacy consists.


--
Kyle Mitchell and Shyane Siriwardena
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
[email protected]
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_____________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.

Reply via email to