Dear all,

The CamPoS (Cambridge Philosophy of Science) seminar continues this 
Wednesday, 27th February, 1-2:30pm in HPS Seminar Room 2. Katharina Kraus 
(HPS, Cambridge) will give a talk entitled "Does psychological knowledge 
presuppose self-knowledge? A Kantian perspective". The abstract is below.

All are very welcome, and we hope to see many of you there.

Best wishes,
Vashka

--

The epistemic status of self-knowledge is highly controversial. If it is 
knowledge at all, it is mostly viewed as a special kind of knowledge with 
specific phenomenological features, such as privileged access and 
first-person authority. Therefore, it has been doubted whether 
self-knowledge claims can be fully grasped in - or even fully reduced to - 
third-person terms and whether reliable methods can be developed to confirm 
or test these claims from an external, non-subjective point of view. 
Nevertheless, in many cases, self-reporting, as expression of one's 
self-knowledge, seems an indispensible tool to find out about certain 
internal features of a person and to assess her inner state. Yet, how can 
we legitimately make use of such knowledge in the setting of a scientific 
investigation in psychology, a science aiming for objective and universal 
knowledge claims?

In this paper, I will propose an account of self-knowledge that, while 
preserving its phenomenological characteristics and thus acknowledging its 
special epistemic status, allows for the use of - and in fact the need for 
- self-knowledge in scientific psychology. Furthermore, this account 
indicates a possible explanation for why self-reports can be meaningfully 
correlated to third-person observations. This account is inspired by Kant's 
theory of self-consciousness and in particular, relies on his conception of 
the consciousness of oneself as subject, or more precisely, as agent of 
thinking. Drawing on Kant's theory, I will argue, first, that there are 
some aspects of self-knowledge that are not reducible to third-person 
object knowledge, and second, that those irreducible aspects give rise to 
substantial knowledge claims that cannot be derived otherwise.


_____________________________________________________
Sent by the CamPhilEvents mailing list. To unsubscribe 
or change your membership options, please visit the list 
information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

Posts are archived here: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Reply via email to