Dear All,

This Wednesday at the last HPS Philosophy Workshop of term, Louise Braddock 
will present a paper entitled: "'You can get here from there': 'thick' 
communication, interpretation, and projective identification explained"

An abstract is included below. 

As usual, the meeting takes place 1-2pm, at HPS on Free School Lane. All 
are welcome.

Best wishes, 
Emily

Abstract: 

'How exactly does a patient succeed in imposing a phantasy and its 
corresponding affect upon his analyst in order to deny it in himself is a 
most interesting problem..... In the analytic situation, a peculiarity of 
communication[s] of this kind is that, at first sight, they do not seem as 
if they had been made by the patient at all. The analyst experiences the 
affect as being his own response to something. The effort involved is in 
differentiating the patient's contribution from his own.' Bion (1955) 
'Language and the schizophrenic'.

The term projective identification originates with the work of Melanie 
Klein, and names a psychoanalytic concept at the centre of Kleinian 
psychoanalytic psychology. The activity of the mind it refers to has the 
dual functions of communication and defence, while implicated also in 
curiosity, coercion and control. Psychoanalysts who employ the concept of 
projective identification are able to describe the 'micro-moments' of these 
human interactions with a high degree of sensitivity, and of consensus. The 
sociologist Michael Rustin has written of the 'craft skills' of clinical 
psychoanalysis as the ability of psychoanalysts to train and be trained in 
the detection of those psychological processes which fall under the concept 
of projective identification. This training proceeds however unaccompanied 
by an adequately clear theoretical account, the concept remaining in need 
of clarification for the following reasons.

First, questions about the methodological validity of these skills, and 
about the reality of the mental activities they claim to detect, become 
acute when the issue arises as to how to explain projective identification 
(which analysts reliably and confidently discern in the clinical setting) 
to: the lay person, the sceptical mental health professional, the 
philosopher, and others who may have little inclination to be tolerant of 
psychoanalysis. Second, within psychoanalysis itself projective 
identification has become a portmanteau concept suffering from over-use to 
the point of forfeiting its explanatory usefulness: in explaining 
everything it explains nothing.

The paper's title 'You can get here from there' promises to show a way of 
clarifying the concept. 'Here' is where we ordinarily stand in our 
psychological understanding; 'there' is the problematic psychoanalytic 
concept. Getting here from there means both retrieving the concept of 
projective identification in an form explanatorily useful for lay people 
and for clinicians, and showing how , with an understanding of what 
projective identification is, the analyst enables the patient to 
communicate his state of mind . My approach follows the 'extension of 
ordinary psychology' strategy pioneered by Wollheim for the defence of 
psychoanalysis. Its methodological claim is that we can only investigate 
the phenomena referred to by the theoretical terms of psychoanalysis by 
building on our ordinary practices of psychological observation.

The paper's first part is (mostly) psychoanalytic and provides an 
expository account of projective identification which, while based in 
Kleinian psychoanalytic theory and clinical material draws only on 
accessible psychoanalytic theses. I show how two psychological processes, 
projection and identification, come together in projective identification 
and how this makes projective identification a form of communication. In 
the second and third (mostly philosophical) parts I clarify the two 
component psychological concepts. In the second part I draw on the theory 
of the speech act to describe the 'thick' communication formed out of the 
patient's projections, his identifications, and his psychoanalyst's 
response. I answer Bion's question about how the patient 'succeed(s) in 
imposing a phantasy and its corresponding affect upon his analyst in order 
to deny it in himself', by explicating projective identification as a 
complex piece of linguistic communication involving the analyst's 
imagination.



_____________________________________________________
Sent by the CamPhilEvents mailing list. To unsubscribe 
or change your membership options, please visit the list 
information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

Posts are archived here: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Reply via email to