Guillermo Polito wrote: > Pharo8 is pretty old :)
Hi Gulliermo, Have you any stats on what are the most used Pharo version? > The best I can propose is that you try compiling the VM without the JIT > compiler. > That will not give you optimum performances, but acceptable ones compared to > Rosetta. > > I’d suggest you try to compile using the branch pharo-9. That’s probably the > oldest branch that is easy to build using cmake. > > If the pharo-9 branch does not work for your image, then maybe you should > check the branches (see the branches v8.x.x). > > For installation/build instructions, please follow the readme instructions. > If you find any issues, tell us, maybe there are cheap workarounds or fixes > :). Thank you for your hints. I try to move the codebase to Pharo9, if it is too cumbersome then I try to compile the VM without JIT. Cheers Davide > Hope that helps, > Guille > > > El 6 ago. 2023, a las 22:07, stephane ducasse > > [stephane.duca...@inria.fr](mailto:stephane.duca...@inria.fr) escribió: > > > > > On 4 Aug 2023, at 20:24, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users > > > [pharo-users@lists.pharo.org](mailto:pharo-users@lists.pharo.org) wrote: > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > I want to use my old Pharo 8 image on an Apple Silicon (ARM64). I > > > downloaded the stable VM for apple silicon > > > http://files.pharo.org/get-files/110/pharo-vm-Darwin- > > > <http://files.pharo.org/get-files/110/pharo-vm-Darwin-arm64-stable.zip>arm64 > > > > > > <http://files.pharo.org/get-files/110/pharo-vm-Darwin-arm64-stable.zip>-stable.zip > > > <http://files.pharo.org/get-files/110/pharo-vm-Darwin-arm64-stable.zip> > > > but it isn't working with my pharo8 image. > > > > > > My old VM is working, of course, but I suppose it's because of Rosetta... > > > and the performance is not optimal. > > > > > > Any other solution? > > > > I do not think that we have a solution. I’m sorry but we decided that we > > cannot garantee that old Pharo version can run on Apple Silicon > > just because of engineering effort. > > With Pharo we are always trying not to trade the past for the future but > > this is difficult. > > > > S.
