Hi! I wonder whether there was a specific reason to name this method #reduce:? I would have expected #fold: as this is the more common term for what it does. And in fact, even the comment reads "Fold the result of the receiver into aBlock." Whereas #reduce: is the common term for what we call with #inject:into: .
I am asking not to annoy anyone but out of curiosity. It figured this out only by some weird behaviour after porting some code that (re)defines #reduce . Ciao! Steffen
