I understand. Hopefully someone can and is willing to help me and we can give the user the experience he/she needs.
I think that what you have said earlier, could be very in hand. That Syunit could be working standalone. > Op 15 augustus 2021 om 23:16 schreef "stephane.duca...@free.fr" > <stephane.duca...@free.fr>: > > > Thanks for the info. > > I read a bit the “spec” > I do not really get the test method cannot be passed? Anyway…. > > > This is the body of the command that is being tested. For example, the > following Ruby test: > > def test_duplicate_items_uniqs_list > cart = ShoppingCart.new > cart.add(:STARIC) > cart.add(:MEDNEW) > cart.add(:MEDNEW) > assert_equal 'Newspaper, Rice', cart.items_list > end > should return a test_code value of: > > "cart = ShoppingCart.new > cart.add(:STARIC) > cart.add(:MEDNEW) > cart.add(:MEDNEW) > assert_equal 'Newspaper, Rice', cart.items_list" > Looking at the other implementation can help. > > https://github.com/exercism?q=-test-runner > > Now my plate is more than full. So I cannot really help because I have too > many things unfinished and that should be done. > > S > > > > On 15 Aug 2021, at 21:02, Roelof Wobben <r.wob...@home.nl> wrote: > > > > Yep, > > > > The spec and other information can be found here : > > https://github.com/exercism/docs/blob/main/building/tooling/test-runners/interface.md > > > > <https://github.com/exercism/docs/blob/main/building/tooling/test-runners/interface.md> > > > > I hoping we can get number 2 or 3 working. > > > > Roelof > > > > > > > > Op 15-8-2021 om 15:15 schreef stephane.duca...@free.fr > > <mailto:stephane.duca...@free.fr>: > >> > >>> Yes, > >>> > >>> There are already some test which are written with Sunit from v2 > >>> challenges. > >>> and for the new one I could write the tests. > >>> > >>> But what I mean is that exercismv 3 wants that the code written by a > >>> student is submitted and that then the tests are run and a json file with > >>> if a test is successfull or with the tests errors is made. > >> > >> We do that for our server (not Json). > >> Do you have a spec of what should be the output? > >> It could be occasion for us to extract a runner and strengthen the logic > >> of the test execution. > >> S > >> > >>> > >>> On v2 the tests were on the same image as the code written by a student. > >>> > >>> Roelof > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Op 13-8-2021 om 22:14 schreef stephane.duca...@free.fr > >>> <mailto:stephane.duca...@free.fr>: > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>>> As far as I see it standalone means work without a image. > >>>>> all the other test-runners run in a vm as far as I know how exercism > >>>>> works. > >>>> > >>>> Nope. :) > >>>> You see in ruby or python or Javascript, you cannot run a software > >>>> without a kernel (and a kernek is an image that cannot be saved and it > >>>> often created > >>>> using some hardcoded C code - but this is the same). They just cannot > >>>> save the kernel once loaded with libraries but this is the same. > >>>> > >>>> So if we can load tests and execute tests without clicking on a button > >>>> interactively. > >>>> Yes we can. > >>>> > >>>> This is what we are doing since we have the jenkins test runner (since > >>>> 2009 or before) and this is what you have when you > >>>> run tests on travis or github actions. > >>>> > >>>> So now the point is to know if their infrastructure needs a script to > >>>> run the tests > >>>> - how to identify them > >>>> - how to execute them > >>>> > >>>> Because in Pharo we can write tests, identify them and execute them > >>>> Interactively but also from the command-line. > >>>> > >>>> Did you already write a test? > >>>> Because if not, it super super important and I will release some a > >>>> booklet on Testing in Pharo. > >>>> and also a new chapter ofr Pharo by example 9 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> https://pharoweekly.wordpress.com/2021/08/04/ann-chapter-sunit-of-pharo-9-by-example/ > >>>> > >>>> <https://pharoweekly.wordpress.com/2021/08/04/ann-chapter-sunit-of-pharo-9-by-example/> > >>>> > >>>> S > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Roelof > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Op 13-8-2021 om 21:50 schreef stephane.duca...@free.fr > >>>>> <mailto:stephane.duca...@free.fr>: > >>>>>> Hello > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Can you be more specific because Pharo got since day 0 (and I would > >>>>>> say even before) a test runner? > >>>>>> The SUnit framework is there already. > >>>>>> We were thinking to extract a runner object to make it first class > >>>>>> from the core framework. > >>>>>> But beside that it is working, maintained, extended (now we have > >>>>>> parametrised tests) and we have (I should publish it) supports for > >>>>>> example (tests without setUp) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Then what is standalone? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> S. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> For the new version of exercism which is due in a few weeks, the > >>>>>>> pharo track needs a test-runner, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> a example of that can be found here : > >>>>>>> https://github.com/exercism/ruby-test-runner/tree/main/lib > >>>>>>> <https://github.com/exercism/ruby-test-runner/tree/main/lib> > >>>>>>> <https://github.com/exercism/ruby-test-runner/tree/main/lib > >>>>>>> <https://github.com/exercism/ruby-test-runner/tree/main/lib>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> first question : Can this be easily be done in pharo? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> second question : can it also be standalone? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Roelof > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
