I am working alone on my app, but I can see the problem with inconsistency in class names. No discussions with my colleagues though :-/
One very high level comment is: had Pharo had namespaces/scopes of some sort I do believe the problem would have looked differently. It it is interesting with a one person-project let me know. Best, Kasper > On 9 May 2021, at 20.25, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: > > Hello Pharoers > > we are running building a tool to help understanding if class names are > consistently named in a project. > We run and are running xp with some of you. Now I was thinking that the idea > and the tool could interest many of you. > So if you want to run the xp here is the text: > > > Nour is developing a tool to support the understanding of the coherence of > class names. > > We would like to invite you to do a small experiment. The tool presents a > visualisation of the distribution of the prefix/suffix (first/last word) > extracted from class names. > The idea is to detect inconsistencies in class names and correct them for a > healthy evolution of the system. > > XP: > === > You can do the xp with other colleagues, it would be nice is you can do > separately and then discuss together. > But this is up to you. 30 or 60 minutes of your precious time should > be enough to do the experiment which is planned as follows: > > - Read the pdf. This support contains detailed information and principles of > the ClassNames Distribution. > - how to load the tools > - Help for the tool also provides a small summary of these principles > as a reminder. > > - To have detailed feedback from which we can extract the necessary analysis, > we would also like you to screen record during the whole experiment, and to > talk freely. > > - Use the tool to detect inconsistencies, write down the changes you would > like to make and discuss the classes you would like to rename. > > - Send us feedback (videos + number of renaming + ///) > > - Any other feedback is welcome :) we can help > Let us know if you encounter problems. > > This experiment (with your feedbacks, the way you use the tool, the changes > you would like to do…) is part of the validation of our tool that we would > like to describe in the journal paper we are currently preparing. > > > Stef Nour and Anne > > > <CnDSupport.pdf> > > -------------------------------------------- > Stéphane Ducasse > http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr <http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/> / > http://www.pharo.org <http://www.pharo.org/> > 03 59 35 87 52 > Assistant: Aurore Dalle > FAX 03 59 57 78 50 > TEL 03 59 35 86 16 > S. Ducasse - Inria > 40, avenue Halley, > Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, Bât.A, Park Plaza > Villeneuve d'Ascq 59650 > France >
