Thanks - I will make further postings in Magritte ML (just subscribed) ML and Discord are friendlier and visible even to the non subscribers than GH discussion boards ,,, my view
Sean P. DeNigris wrote > Sanjay Minni wrote >> > <magritte Description> >> ... Are the pragmas required > > Yes, annotating methods is how they are registered as part of the Magritte > description. There have been several non-backward-compatible Magritte > versions (currently on v. 3), so that may have been added later; note that > these methods should be on the instance side, unlike in the original > Magritte. Here is an example: > > MyClass>>#descriptionHasMetacelloConfiguration > > <magritteDescription> > ^ MABooleanDescription new > priority: 250; > accessor: #hasMetacelloConfiguration; > beReadOnly; > beRequired; > yourself > > p.s. happy to discuss here, but we also added a discussion place to the GH > repo: https://github.com/magritte-metamodel/magritte/discussions > p.p.s. there is a Magritte ML, but it doesn't get much traffic > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html ----- cheers, Sanjay -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
