Thanks Peter. Here some informations about execution time :
dic := Dictionary new: 10000. Time microsecondsToRun:[ 1 to: 10000 do:[ :i | dic at: i put: i printString. ]. ]. "6000µs" Time microsecondsToRun:[ 1 to: 10000 do:[ :i | dic removeKey: i. ]. ]. "2683000µs, up to 447x" Regarding your comment, I have wrote a too simple example. Here a new test with a better representation of my need and datas (randomization) : dic := Dictionary new: 10000. pool := SortedCollection new: 10000. random := Random new. pool sort:[ :a :b | random next < 0.5 ]. 1 to: 10000 do:[ :i | pool add: i ]. Time microsecondsToRun:[ pool do:[ :i | dic at: i put: i printString. ]. ]. "6000µs => same time, good point" Time microsecondsToRun:[ pool do:[ :i | dic removeKey: i. ]. ]. "17000µs, up to 2,8x => huge changes !" It’s appear more reasonable ! I need to test it with real datas, to be continued. Thanks for all. Pierre De : Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org] De la part de PBKResearch Envoyé : lundi 3 février 2020 12:25 À : 'Any question about pharo is welcome' Objet : Re: [Pharo-users] Dictionary removeKey: very low Pierre It’s all to do with rehashing. A dictionary is stored as an Array of Association. After a key and its corresponding association is removed, the remaining entries are rehashed from the removal point to the end of the array. By doing the removals in natural order, you rehash the whole of the remaining array after each removal. Try doing the removals in reverse order; on my machine it reduces the time from 6 seconds to 6 milliseconds. HTH Peter Kenny From: Pharo-users <pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org> On Behalf Of LABORDE Pierre Sent: 03 February 2020 10:18 To: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Subject: [Pharo-users] Dictionary removeKey: very low Hi all, I have a problem with Dictionaries : dic := Dictionary new: 10000. 1 to: 10000 do:[ :i | dic at: i put: i printString. ]. 1 to: 10000 do:[ :i | dic removeKey: i. ] Removing each keys is very slooow, time execution difference between add and remove is crazy. Any idea for fix that ? Can I use another Dictionary implementation or settings ? Thanks. Pierre