Just to clarify, as I see it: -- this OP (http://forum.world.st/Smalltalk-It-s-Not-Your-Grandfather-s-Programming-Language-tp5109548.html) announces article "Smalltalk: It’s Not Your Grandparent’s Programming Language"; the article has 1 occurrence of the word "car", and refers to a Maserati
-- tbrunz' comment is the first in that thread to mention "electric car" and to compare it to Smalltalk (http://forum.world.st/Smalltalk-It-s-Not-Your-Grandfather-s-Programming-Language-tp5109548p5109556.html) -- then this OP (http://forum.world.st/As-promised-the-sequel-tt5109954.html) announces article "How is Smalltalk’s revival like the e-car’s revival?" Hence my earlier note that if you "hadn't already meant to follow up w/ the e-car parallel, perhaps refer to this mailing list" (which would be great exposure for the list), and to cite/credit the genesis of the article's thesis. -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
