On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 02:35:03PM +0100, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > I’m curious why you chose to use ffi for this one in particular as it > would seem to be quite straightforward to do it all in native > Smalltalk (not to down play your integration in any way of course). > Was performance a big thing? Or was it simply relying on others to > keep it up to date?
I wanted something that works out of the box. I did not want to implement MD parsing myself. Also I saw hoedown's wiki page on bindings and thought I'd put Smalltalk on the map there. https://github.com/hoedown/hoedown/wiki/Bindings Pierce
