On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 2:21 PM p...@highoctane.be <p...@highoctane.be> wrote:
> It is like Object>>in: aBlock no? > Yes. But because it is an operator, you can write "obj => block => block => block". You can not write "obj in: block in: block in: block", because smalltalk will think it is a selector named "in:in:in:". Best, Kasper
