Sean, good point about dev vs. prod. Thanks for adding.
I was indeed talking about development images. There is no loss of code in a runtime image, because you usually don't ship the "original" devleopment image... Of course, chances are a production image crashes when you ship bugs, but it' won't loose code. Joacim > "Sean P. DeNigris" <s...@clipperadams.com mailto:s...@clipperadams.com > hat > am 11. Oktober 2019 um 20:07 geschrieben: > > > jtuchel wrote > > > > I guess this has its roots in long-ongoing discussions about the > > anticipated disadvantages of image-based development in general. > > > > > I would also add that IMHO a lot of (or maybe almost all) the > > angst of > possible image crashes comes during development (with increasing risks as > experiments get more exotic or delve deeper into the kernel), not > deployment. Crashing may be less of an issue now for professional use > since > there is a development/deployment distinction, unlike historically and in > a > pure Dynabook vision where all users are developers. > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html >
