Sven - Thanks for mentioning this - it's fascinating to see how it works. Even though it's only (!) 900+ selectors, it must have been a nightmare to construct - the layout of the source code suggests there was a lot of manual effort. Peter
Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote > Note that 'find by example' seems magical, but it isn't, really. The set > of discoverable selectors is limited. See MethodFinder > >> On 30 Mar 2019, at 13:26, Tim Mackinnon < > tim@ > > wrote: >> >> I actually keep meaning to try and plug this in to spotter so we get all >> of this stuff in one easy place (I think its pretty simple, just haven’t >> had a chance to try it yet). >> >> Tim >> >>> On 30 Mar 2019, at 09:26, Peter Kenny < > peter@.co > > wrote: >>> >>> Ben >>> >>> Thanks for pointing this out - I was not aware of it. At first sight the >>> notation is completely opaque - I had no idea what the query in you post >>> meant until I read through the instructions in Finder. Now I have tried >>> it, >>> it looks quite handy. >>> >>> Minor nit-pick: The instructions say the components of a example are >>> separated by a period. This should read 'period plus space'; I put in >>> #(1 2 >>> 3 4).0.4 as an example and it said no such method. Granted the example > >>> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html >> -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
