Hi Hernan, 

Really nice. I try it today.

It might be what I need.

I come back if installation pb.

Cheers,

Cédrick

> Le 8 mars 2019 à 03:34, Hernán Morales Durand <hernan.mora...@gmail.com> a 
> écrit :
> 
> Hi Cédrick,
> 
> I wrote some years ago an interface to a named-entity recognizer:
> https://80738163270632.blogspot.com/2015/02/stner-interface-to-stanford-named.html
> 
> I think that was Pharo 5, so you may want to check if there are load
> problems in current Pharo.
> 
> The blogger post didn't parsed correctly the output but for the input:
> 
> StSocketNERClient new
> tagText: 'Argentina President Kirchner has been asked to testify in
> court on the death of Alberto Nisman the crusading prosecutor who had
> accused her of conspiring to cover up involvement of Iran'
> 
> 
> output would be:
> 
> '<location>Argentina</LOCATION> President <person>Kirchner</PERSON>
> has been asked to testify in court on the death of <person>Alberto
> Nisman</PERSON> the crusading prosecutor who had accused her of
> conspiring to cover up involvement of <location>Iran</LOCATION>'
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Hernán
> 
> El jue., 7 mar. 2019 a las 6:53, Cédrick Béler (<cdric...@gmail.com>) 
> escribió:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I’ve often got the need to analyse some random unstructured text to discover 
>> (structured) information (in email for instance), to extract :
>> - emails
>> - telephone numbers
>> - addresses
>> - events
>> - person names (according to a list of known persons),
>> - etc…
>> 
>> Apple do it in email for instance (strangely, this is not generalized).
>> 
>> 
>> So my questions are :
>> - do we have something equivalent in Smalltalk/Pharo ? (I didn’t find)
>> - if not, what strategy would you use ?
>> => I do really stupid text analysis (substrings, finding @, …, parsing 
>> according to the text structure when there is… kind of Soup parsing…)
>> => I feel this is a job for PetitParser ? And would be a nice feet to the 
>> new GToolkit.
>> 
>> All ideas or suggestions are welcome ;-)
>> 
>> 
>> TIA,
>> 
>> Cédrick
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 


Reply via email to