Yeah, readme is out of date. 64 bits is working: https://github.com/pharo-contributions/OSSubprocess/issues/22
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 4:48 PM Alistair Grant <akgrant0...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 13:45, Albrecht Baur via Pharo-users > <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> wrote: > > > > Thank you. > > > > The Metacello snippet helps. It loads a newer version than that from the > catalog browser. > > > > > > But 2 more questions: > > > > 1.: Is there a reason not to use just ... > > > > LibC uniqueInstance system: 'zip -r 123.zip zipme/' > > You don't have the same level of control over the process, can't pipe > stdio, it introduces issues with interrupts (SIGINT, SIGQUIT), etc. > > > > And 2.: Is it ok to use OSSubprocess on in 64 bit images even though the > documentation says it doesn't work ? (but it does) > > > > -> https://github.com/pharo-contributions/OSSubprocess#installation > > That's a surprise. Yes, OSSubprocess is officially supported on 64 > bits, the readme is out of date. > > HTH, > Alistair > > -- Mariano https://twitter.com/MartinezPeck http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
