This is great news. Thanks!

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:44 PM Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

> Thanks a lot for doing this!
>
> It is of great help to know that we can reliably work with Postgres.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> > On Feb 12, 2019, at 3:22 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a new release of P3, the modern, lean and mean PostgreSQL
> client for Pharo.
> >
> > https://github.com/svenvc/P3
> >
> > Version 1.2 contains the following changes:
> >
> > - P3PreparedStatement is now joined by a polymorphic
> P3FormattedStatement working client side on text strings
> > - P3PreparedStatement & P3FormattedStatement now share the same double
> dispatch mechanism to process argument binding
> > - Added convenience methods #listDatabases #listSchemas &
> #listTablesInSchema: to P3Client
> > - Added convenience methods #firstColumnData & #firstFieldOfFirstRecord
> to P3Result
> > - Added dynamic ENUM support via #loadEnums in P3Client
> > - Add support for the 7 geometric types POINT, CIRCLE, LINE, LSEG,
> POLYGON & PATH with corresponding objects P3Point, P3Circle, P3Line,
> P3LineSegment, P3Polygon & P3Path
> > - Add support for the INTERVAL type with P3Interval object
> > - Added P3Client>>#serverVersion accessor
> > - Add support for BIT & VARBIT types with P3FixedBitString & P3BitString
> objects
> > - Add TIMETZ support
> > - Organised P3 package with tags
> > - More & better documentation & unit tests
> >
> > https://github.com/svenvc/P3/releases/tag/v1.2
> >
> > The quality of open source software is determined by it being alive,
> supported and maintained.
> >
> > The first way to help is to simply use P3 in your projects and report
> back about your successes and the issues that you encounter. You can ask
> questions on the Pharo mailing lists.
> >
> > Enjoy,
> >
> > Sven
> >
> > --
> > Sven Van Caekenberghe
> > Proudly supporting Pharo
> > http://pharo.org
> > http://association.pharo.org
> > http://consortium.pharo.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> www.feenk.com
>
> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
>
>
>

Reply via email to