I'm running 64-bit Debian in a VirtualBox image on my Mac. When I install 64-bit Pharo, it works fine. When I install 32-bit Pharo, I get the error message below. What's the difference??? Why can one find the display driver and the other can't? This makes no sense.
Earlier, people have been telling me to use './pharo-ui Pharo.image &'. Is this no longer kosher? What am I doing wrong? Fred Kaiser Borg wrote > Those errors are not related to a 32 or 64 bits problem. The issue looks > like you've launched pharo-ui which looks for a physical screen that > isn't there. Are you trying to run pharo-ui in a debian VPS ? > > You should run 'pharo' and 'pharo-ui', something like this: > > $ pharo myApplication.image > > Search on google for 'pharo headless', you should find plenty of example. > > HTH, > > Fred > > On 22/11/2018 13:31, horrido wrote: >> I ran 32-bit Pharo under 64-bit Debian and got this error: >> >> [1] 8127 >> richard@debian:~/pharo32$ could not find display driver vm-display-X11; >> either: >> - check that >> /home/richard/pharo32/pharo-vm/lib/pharo/5.0-201806281256//vm-display-X11.so >> exists, or >> - use the '-plugins > <path> > ' option to tell me where it is, or >> - remove DISPLAY from your environment. >> ./pharo-ui: line 11: 8131 Aborted >> "$DIR"/"pharo-vm/pharo" >> "$@" >> >> ---------- >> >> I thought you could always run 32-bit software in a 64-bit OS, but I >> guess >> I'm wrong. >> >> >> >> Sean P. DeNigris wrote >>> horrido wrote >>>> it threw up a bunch of errors. >>> Can you be more specific and did you try Mariano's suggestion about >>> 32-bit >>> libs? >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Cheers, >>> Sean >>> -- >>> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html >> -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
