Hi,

 

You may want to look at https://github.com/VincentBlondeau/Cruiser that 
contains all the actions needed to perform a clean packaging (Still in dev 
though).

The only issue is that it works for Pharo 7 only and you’ll need to backport 
changes (I can help you on that). Some changes are related to new VM primitives 
so you have to use the current stable one (which should also running the Pharo 
6.1 images).

 

Don’t hesitate to ask me if you need advices or help on this.

 

I could try to make the tool work on Pharo 6, but it could be incomplete 
especially on the FFI and stdio part.

 

HTH,

 

Cheers,

Vincent

 

From: Pharo-users <pharo-users-boun...@lists.pharo.org> On Behalf Of Guillermo 
Polito
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 6:04
To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] problem when running without changes file (on 
windows)

 

Hi Hans,

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 2:56 PM Baveco, Hans <hans.bav...@wur.nl 
<mailto:hans.bav...@wur.nl> > wrote:

        Ok, thanks for this crucial information! Would backporting be as simple 
as filing out the class and the single method from Pharo7 and filing in in 
Pharo6.1 ? (probably not)

 

While not completely sure, I think they actually could work. Maybe you found in 
the way a couple of other methods to backport, but I think that it should not 
be that difficult.

 

This is the original issue that fixed this in Pharo7:

 

https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21124/FFI-should-work-without-the-sources 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__pharo.fogbugz.com_f_cases_21124_FFI-2Dshould-2Dwork-2Dwithout-2Dthe-2Dsources&d=DwMFaQ&c=RWI7EqL8K9lqtga8KxgfzvOYoob76EZWE0yAO85PVMQ&r=kIZIYXBAA3fhM7P5HOuTC5w6mnEApTfXPTq3lR34ZiY&m=zueS3nflFQs72ZqbAT4is78d2UpD9JXXi7jAp6Luxok&s=Gt8I-Pl8yzIRifPtshzLQaSp6N32UNhEcPVLmdyrYIg&e=>
 

 

And here the PR with the fix:

 

https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/739 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_pharo-2Dproject_pharo_pull_739&d=DwMFaQ&c=RWI7EqL8K9lqtga8KxgfzvOYoob76EZWE0yAO85PVMQ&r=kIZIYXBAA3fhM7P5HOuTC5w6mnEApTfXPTq3lR34ZiY&m=zueS3nflFQs72ZqbAT4is78d2UpD9JXXi7jAp6Luxok&s=Omu3Ix_N-j7eA6wU7S1AhC5mhH51qh8rmDonNQzete0&e=>
 

 

There are a couple of more changes there, but not so many.

 

 

Attachment: pgpw1LKYPh89n.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to