Yes, I agree with most of the comments here. I'll try to summarize:
- we should be able to specify the name of a project independently of
their location/repository name
- Maybe, for old projects that don't have a name, we could initialize a
project's name as it's repository name?
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:07 AM Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote:
> Sounds like the user override is what we are after - I guess we need to
> make a pr ... sadly my laptop has died so it’s not going to be me for a
> little while until I can find an Apple store on my travels.
>
> Tim
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 2 Oct 2018, at 12:30, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 23:16, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Tim Mackinnon wrote
>> > either by showing {owner}/{project}
>>
>> What about when there are multiple remotes?
>>
>
> +1 to what you imply here, that the owner/remote should not be auto-coded
> into the project name.
> Remote are well handled within Iceberg.
> The user though could add the owner as free text into a custom project
> name i.e. "owner-project"
>
> cheers -ben
>
>
>
--
Guille Polito
Research Engineer
Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
CRIStAL - UMR 9189
French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr
<http://www.cnrs.fr>*
*Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io>
*Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13
